← All arguments
Objection 10 · The accident of birth

Religious belief tracks geography, not truth.

The objection, in full

Had you been born in Riyadh, you'd defend Islam with the same conviction you now defend Christianity. Lhasa, Buddhism. Ancient Athens, the Olympians. The overwhelming predictor of someone's "saving faith" is the latitude and longitude of their crib. A truth this important shouldn't depend on a postal code.

If we have a knock-down argument that the others can't have, it's strange that almost no one finds it except by accident of birth.
— John Hick, paraphrased

or, in plain terms —If I'd been born in Pakistan, I'd be a Muslim. So how is my faith "true"?

C.S. Lewis
literary apologist
1898–1963

The objection cuts both ways.

If geography decides religion, it also decides atheism. The modern Englishman who dismisses God was raised in a culture that taught him to. The Soviet child raised under militant atheism was no freer in his unbelief than the Tibetan child in his Buddhism. The argument, pressed honestly, dissolves every conviction anyone has ever held — including the conviction that geography decides convictions.

What the argument really shows is that humans receive their starting points from their cultures. This is true of mathematics, ethics, and language as well. It does not follow that there is no mathematics, no ethics, no truth in language. It follows only that we begin somewhere and must reason from there.

I was an atheist who became a Christian by argument and against my will. The accident-of-birth thesis cannot account for me, or for the Muslim who becomes Christian, or the Christian who becomes Buddhist. People do change.

Citations Mere Christianity (1952), Bk. II · Surprised by Joy (1955)
Ad maiorem Dei gloriam